Sunday, December 17, 2017

REVIEW: Turn the Ship Around!: A True Story of Turning Followers into Leaders by L. David Marquet (4-stars)

To be honest - I have never had a strong interest in military-oriented reading material, fiction or non-fiction.  Aside from my interest in pre 20th century piracy on the high seas (more of social class/mobility angle here) - I haven't really read any books about life on boats or submarines.

David Marquet has written an incredibly clear and easy to understand book - that happens to be about submarines and their crews.  The details about life on the submarine are sometimes a bit more than my interest can tolerate but overall the message about process and changing the structure from leader-follower to leader-leader is crystal clear.   His writing style is incredibly well structured and meticulous -- all the examples work really well for his story.

As noted in the introduction, the core belief is that we can all be leaders - and the best way to get to that is to have a leader who can help identify the shared goals and vision for the team, and then let them do their work, providing feedback on what is working best as a way to attain excellence (vs avoiding mistakes).  This is a system of empowerment that is focused on outcomes, and which worked so well for the author in his command that he DOUBLED the number of chiefs (who then transferred off to other ships the next day to new roles). 

He discusses situations where team members automatically executed incorrect instructions from their leader or where mistakes were made because someone was operating on "auto pilot."  Changing the processes to focus on the outcomes and goals rather than process/method made a huge difference.

The key concepts in this book include:

1.  Achieve excellence - don't just avoid errors.  

2.  Use "I intend to... " to turn passive followers into active leaders.  Avoid disempowered phrases such as "Request permission to . . . I would like to . . . What should I do about . . . Do you think we should . . . Could we . . ." (and I was always told "hopefully").   In empowering the officers to be responsible for their work - "the goal for the officers would be to give me a sufficiently complete report so that all I had to say was a simple approval."

3.  Enhance opportunities for informal communication -- encourage team members to "THINK OUT LOUD is a mechanism for CONTROL" and ORGANIZATIONAL CLARITY.  Author says "when I heard what my watch officers were thinking, it made it much easier for me to keep my mouth shut and let them execute their plans."  This is related to "deliberate action."  For example - where there is a process that has a significant impact (whether it's torpedoes or sending out an e-mail blast) - it helps to talk through what you intend so that a peer can catch any potential mistakes before the actual action.  "Take deliberate action. We learn (everywhere, all the time). Don’t brief, certify."

4.  Search for organizational practices or procedures that would need to be changed in order to effect the change required - that means updating any documentation, handbooks, wiki etc.

5.  "Fake it til you make it" - or, as the author says "Acting your way to new thinking" as a mechanism for control.  Even if you feel bad - smile - that will eventually make you feel better (it's proven).  If you have doubts and don't fully commit to a new thing - it will come through so fake it til it feels natural and only then will you be able to determine the efficacy.

6.  Short early conversations make efficient work (another mechanism for control) - this is basically like a daily standup in Agile - it helps to talk through any questions and get an idea of where potential misunderstandings or misdirections may lie.  A standup isn't intended to solve all the problems - you may create more meetings out of this but it's a good touchpoint!

7.  "RESIST THE URGE TO PROVIDE SOLUTIONS is a mechanism for CONTROL."   The leader has to create space for open decision by the entire team; in crisis situations - you can have the team brainstorm and then as a leader vet the best option for action.

8.  "ELIMINATING TOP-DOWN MONITORING SYSTEMS is a mechanism for CONTROL."  Marquet emphasizes the use of mechanisms that actually give ownership and describes a log of work requests that was owned and maintained but not accessible by the entire team so they could actually see the backlog of work and get things done.  He also says to avoid systems where senior personnel are determining what junior personnel should be doing as their day to day tasks - giving them goals and then reviewing their tactics (ie the "I intend to" reports).

9.  "EMBRACE THE INSPECTORS is a mechanism for CONTROL, organizational control."  Use the opportunities provided by inspection to learn where improvements can be made. 

10. "WE LEARN (EVERYWHERE, ALL THE TIME) is a mechanism for COMPETENCE."  This was a great  section on learning from mistakes without coming down really hard on the team members - everything is a learning opportunity. 

11.  "DON’T BRIEF, CERTIFY is a mechanism for COMPETENCE." - this was fantastic because instead of the chief reading off the process while everyone else's eyes glazed over, the person who would be doing the task would identify the steps that he would be taking and the others would certify that process was correct (technical competence).

12. "CONTINUALLY AND CONSISTENTLY REPEAT THE MESSAGE is a mechanism for COMPETENCE."

13.  "SPECIFYING GOALS, NOT METHODS is a mechanism for COMPETENCE." and CLARITY.  Two excellent examples were around fire drills - which weren't going well because of process (ie "I'm not in charge of this area/shift") to make everyone responsible and the crew members CLOSEST to the fire would be responsible for taking action.  On the ship, stealth (ie, not making loud noises) is critical so any time some loud noise is made - it can affect the sonar.  The goal of a stealth ship was emphasized and everyone was required to report noises instead of the sonar team trying to find the source of a transient noise.  This resulted in identifying a lot of other issues that they were able to fix and move even closer toward excellence. 

14. "BUILDING TRUST AND TAKING CARE OF YOUR PEOPLE is a mechanism for CLARITY."  Providing them opportunities and materials to improve themselves both in their professional and personal goals builds a much stronger, competent and empowered team.

15.  "USE YOUR LEGACY FOR INSPIRATION is a mechanism for CLARITY."  Note achievements and legacy - these are helpful for guiding the team.

16.  "USE GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR DECISION CRITERIA is a mechanism for CLARITY."  Development of guiding principles (see the book - fantastic list created by his chiefs) is critical to empowering a team.

17.  "USE IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION TO REINFORCE DESIRED BEHAVIORS is a mechanism for CLARITY." The author would provide immediate positive feedback vs submitting a form and waiting for a process to give the reward/recognition to the individual.  He also points out that "Simply providing data to the teams on their relative performance results in a natural desire to improve."

18.  "BEGIN WITH THE END IN MIND is an important mechanism for ORGANIZATIONAL CLARITY."  The author worked with his officers in weekly one-on-one mentoring sessions to discuss goals and what they wanted their evaluations to look like 1, 2 and 3 years hence -- working with them to develop goals that cascaded down from the organization's goals.  This turned into an opportunity for 2-way feedback and the end result was that his officers were able to achieve those goals by the end of their terms.

19.  "ENCOURAGE A QUESTIONING ATTITUDE OVER BLIND OBEDIENCE is a mechanism for CLARITY."

All in all - a really solid book with a ton of great examples from the author's experiences.  I'd LOVE to read a book written by one of the enlisted men on that ship to see his perspective and to see how that has carried over to other assignments on different vessels that may have had a top-down structure of leadership.

REVIEW: Turn the Ship Around!: A True Story of Turning Followers into Leaders by L. David Marquet 

RATING: 4-stars

© Jennifer R Clark. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt this content with proper attribution.

Monday, December 04, 2017

REVIEW: Whispers Under Ground (Rivers of London, #3) by Ben Aaronovitch (3-stars)

This was also a fun book - and honestly, I keep reading these and thinking that they are really written with a screenplay in mind, and I sure would look forward to watching this as a TV series!

The protagonist, Peter Grant, is funny, self effacing and bright but not always quick on the uptake with certain things. He's also got a huge hangup about his friend Lesley's magic-related injury to her face (despite one of the other characters in this story referring to her as "sex on legs").

He's doing his best to maintain a level of professionalism ("I took the wine but avoided the smile, what with me being on duty and everything." but disaster seems to follow him everywhere.

I now know that grapes are de rigeur when visiting someone in hospital in England.

There's an interesting bit of overlap with a concept from American Gods:

any system, such as an underground railway or indeed the telephone network, could develop a genius loci in the same fashion as the rivers and other sacred sites.
if a Scotsman introduced himself to me as the god of telephones I’d be inclined to take him at his word.
This is really similar to the idea that belief creates reality -- and I also thoroughly enjoy the references to other stories of time travel and fantasy (such as the Morlock) sprinkled throughout.

A COUPLE NITS

  • Now that I'm into the 3rd book in this world - I'm finding there's a bit more backstory than I need. I'd like the "read straight through" version -- can we have all the books in the series together with the backstory repeats cut out of each tale?
  • I keep reading this "urban fantasy" tag with these books and I can't figure out what on earth it is supposed to mean: are most "fantasy" or supernatural books in some sort of rural or wild setting? Like the hobbits charming rural English village setting or the True Blood rural Louisiana swamp setting with alligators and werewolves running around? Or is it "urban fantasy" because the chief protagonist is black? What's the deal with such a meaningless genre name?

ONE MORE NIT

How awful is Lesley's face? Seriously? Is it so awful that Peter really can't see past it and see the real Lesley who he lusted for and spooned with for so long? Is he really that shallow?

Facial reconstruction has come a long way - just look up face transplants (this one is safe for work) - and even Bonnie Culp looks way better than she did before her crazy ex husband shot off her face AND she's got a partner who loves her (unlike poor Lesley!).

Is Lesley's injury worse than any of those people you can see on the internet?

REVIEW: Whispers Under Ground (Rivers of London, #3) by Ben Aaronovitch  

RATING: 3-stars

 © Jennifer R Clark. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt this content with proper attribution.

Wednesday, September 06, 2017

REVIEW: A Rose for Emily by William Faulkner (4 stars)

 This is a short story - not at all a "book" - and I found a version online. Quick read and creepy! It's interesting how people will look the other way when they know something is wrong or someone is up to no good, as a show of "respect." It's also interesting to me how Emily clings to tradition - the structure she has always known - instead of breaking free, into the unknown. She holds onto her father's corpse as a way of resisting changes to her life. She becomes a recluse. She even kills the man she loves to keep him around. In the end - she transforms into her father - controlling, secretive, manipulative. The larger, darker silhouette in the tableau. Analyses of this story are a great rabbit hole.

REVIEW: A Rose for Emily by William Faulkner 
RATING: 4 stars
© Jennifer R Clark. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt this content with proper attribution.

Wednesday, July 26, 2017

REVIEW: American Gods by Neil Gaiman (5-stars)

 I confess that I only read this because I recently watched the TV series and I enjoyed both.  The TV series seemed awfully violent and bloody - especially the first episode.  There's a lot that was changed in the TV series from the book - and I truly marvel at the skill and imagination of the authors of the screen play -- what they created is absolutely in line with this universe.


The book was very enjoyable -- I found Gaiman's writing style to be very easy to read.   He's got a good sense of humor and I enjoy the small jokes that he weaves in.  Many of the characters were very likeable - and I really admire the way he created such a dense web of interrelationships, stories and sub-plots.  


It wasn't until I was nearly halfway through the book - that I asked, "Who IS Shadow Moon, anyway?"   Gaiman's interpretations of mythology and character development is a lot of fun to read.  I just wish I had the paperback version (not the e-book) so I could share this with someone.

If you've been reading reviews of the TV series written by fans of the book - you'll already know that the carousel scene is not in the TV series, and there are several other things that have been added which are very enjoyable (such as expanding Mad Sweeny and Laura Moon's characters, changing the location of the first meeting with Easter and her response, OMG the ice cream truck!).

I did read the expanded author's special edition which may have added scenes and content not in the well loved original version of the book.  The carousel scene was a really fun pile of events -- reminded me of the descriptions of hallucinations in "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" in some ways.  When Shadow Moon looks at Mr Nancy - he sees all the visual incarnations at once -- which is a stretch for a human brain, right?  

The idea that "gods" are created by a number of people growing to believe in a thing is the basic premise of this book -- people brought their "gods" with them from other lands, like cutting a branch of code off a tree -- that god came as a version of him/herself at the time, leaving behind versions in the homeland who may be having a different experience.  The "old gods" are basically subroutines.  The new gods are net-new -- maybe that makes them more powerful in some ways, but also less personally invested in the same kinds of things that drive the other gods.

One of my favorite concepts in the book was "Backstage" -- the idea that there is this place that looks like the world we see, but it's not quite the same. Even the passage of time is different - a few minutes backstage is like hours in the world we see, and so on. This alternate reality is a convenient mechanism for playing out important actions and conversations.


REVIEW: American Gods by Neil Gaiman 

RATING: 5-stars


© Jennifer R Clark. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt this content with proper attribution.