Another Hugo reading list book, "Emily Wilde's Compendium of Lost Tales" is the 3rd book in the Emily Wild series. Emily's refusal to have an interior life stops reading as restraint and starts reading as evasion.
Throughout the trilogy, Emily processes experience clinically. She journals about magical encounters like they're field notes. She observes Wendell's emotional labor without reciprocating it. She finds him physically attractive but fundamentally mismatches his values. And when she finally admits to missing him—the single moment of genuine emotional depth in this 300+ page book—she frames it as clinical observation: "I missed Wendell with a sudden and painful ache that left me short of breath, a sensation that would have surprised me had I not been experiencing it regularly, even when he'd been there beside me." Even her longing is processed as data.
This wouldn't matter if the book was actually a journal or field notes. Real journals have interiority. Real scholars question their own biases and feelings. But these "journals" just read like convenient first-person narration. The dated chapter headers feel like window dressing—there's no sustained reflection, no self-examination, no moment where Emily genuinely reckons with why she's with Wendell or what she actually wants.
Wendell doesn't just observe her needs—he solves them thoughtfully: protecting her with Veil-sewn cloaks he carefully adjusts as circumstances change, tailoring her clothing so she actually looks like herself instead of a shapeless outline, commissioning faeries to create an entire library of journals for her work. Emily's response is to complain they're too fancy. She doesn't examine these acts. She doesn't thank him. She doesn't let them matter.
The book compounds this by piling narrative complications onto an already thin emotional foundation. A wicked stepmother a la "Snow White" repents offstage and asks for "just give me a nice ADU, Dear"—completely unearned, never explained. A grandfather's secret journal reveals a unashamed faerie serial killer who drips blood everywhere and lives in the castle. A new layer of lore gets grafted onto the existing mythology. None of this deepens Emily or Wendell's relationship. It just makes the book busier.
What's genuinely interesting gets sacrificed to plot density. Wendell created a love nest for the lesbian couple from the previous book and lets Emily visit them—that's touching and unexpected. But the characters remain one-dimensional plot devices. There's an underwater castle accessible only to mortals that serves as sanctuary, a refuge where different rules apply—but Emily never considers it as her own safe space. Poe (the small one) gains depth and affection, but Emily never advocates for herself, never asks what she actually wants from faerie queenship, never negotiates with the people making her clothes about functional specifications even though she's the actual the queen.
She won't put her notebooks in the magical pockets of her new garments because she's afraid they'll disappear. She picks the plainest gown from many options because she's committed to being unremarkable. She refuses special treatment based on an unfounded and implied belief she doesn't deserve it. This isn't humility. It's a refusal to inhabit her own agency. And after three books, that refusal has shifted from interesting neurodivergent coding into something more like punishment.
The book abuses Emily through systematic self-abnegation and refuses her the depth it claims to offer. You finish reading journals that never actually examine the person writing them. The abuse isn't physical or magical—it's narrative. Emily is kept so carefully at a distance that you never know what she actually feels or wants, and neither does she.
REVIEW: Emily Wilde's Compendium of Lost Tales by Heather Fawcett
RATING: 2-stars
No comments:
Post a Comment