A competent, readable survey of the psychology of "reading" other minds — mind perception, dehumanization, overconfidence in our assumptions about what others think and feel — but it plays like a 201-level undergrad course compiled into book form. Greatest-hits research, popular studies you've likely encountered before, stitched together with narrative glue rather than a distinct original argument. If you've spent any real time in organizational behavior or social psych, there's not much new territory here.
A recurring pattern across the book: study after study on perspective-taking shows people just imagining what someone else is thinking, and getting it wrong — not randomly, but in ways that trace back to their own biases and insecurities. Epley leans on the old Carlin bit about how everyone driving slower than you is an idiot and everyone driving faster is a maniac — a good shorthand for how our own reference point quietly becomes the norm we judge everyone else against. His actual prescription is sharper than the usual "walk a mile in their shoes" platitude: he argues for trying to get someone's perspective by asking and listening, rather than taking it by imagining your way into their head — which is really just projection with extra steps. It's a solid reframe, but by the back half of the book the same basic move (person imagines, person is wrong, bias is the culprit) repeats often enough to feel like a broken record.
One fact genuinely stopped me: Epley notes infants routinely underwent surgery without anesthesia until the early 1990s, because doctors didn't believe infants could feel pain — I had to look it up to confirm it. It also tracked with my own experience: I had a titanium screw removed from my ulna in 1990, and the doctor gave me only local anesthesia to open the skin before taking a ratcheting wrench to the hex bolt in my arm, confidently informing me "there are no nerve endings in the bone." It hurt like hell, and he looked genuinely shaken that I reacted. But that story is really two failures stacked on top of each other, and only one of them is what Epley's book is actually about. His book is about the moment-to-moment failure to model someone else's mind — the imagining-instead-of-asking problem. What happened to me is the deeper version: that doctor, likely in his 50s, had been trained on a certified fact ("no nerve endings in bone") the same way an earlier generation of doctors had been trained that infants don't feel pain. He wasn't guessing badly about my mind in the moment — he was executing a belief the field had already gotten wrong for him, before he ever picked up the wrench. That's a colder failure than anything perspective-taking exercises can fix, and the book doesn't really go there.
The one place the book clearly earns its keep: a sharp critique of the iceberg model that's calcified into gospel in leadership and PM training. Epley's objection is that the metaphor reinforces the myth that we only use 10% of our brains — implying the unconscious "90%" is dormant, untapped potential. He argues that's backwards: the unconscious runs most of what you do in a given moment, while consciousness handles the smaller job of making sense of your behavior after the fact so you can explain it to yourself and others. Genuinely useful for anyone who's sat through a training deck treating the submerged part of the iceberg as a vast reservoir waiting to be mined.
Solid intro-level primer if you're new to the subject. If you've already got the background, or you've read his later book on talking to strangers, "A Little More Social," you'll feel like you're watching him warm up for a better book he hadn't written yet.
NOTE: It's a short read -- ends at around 70% on Kindle with the remainder being very extensive end notes.
REVIEW: Mindwise by Nichalas Epley
RATING: 3-stars
No comments:
Post a Comment